Time to Support the Warren Cummings (CARE) Act and End the Opioid Crisis
By Donna Ward
Last week on Facebook, a friend posted a remembrance of the second anniversary of the death of her 32-year-old niece due to a fentanyl overdose. Similarly, one of our neighbors in Montclair lost their 27-year-old son this year to heroin laced with fentanyl. The opioid epidemic is still wreaking havoc in New Jersey. While the rate of opioid prescriptions in New Jersey declined from 2016 to 2017, (the latest data available) and is below the national average, deaths from drug overdoses skyrocketed +29% to 2,685. The state’s rate of drug overdose deaths of 30.0 per thousand in 2017 is still well above the U.S. average of 21.7. Nationally, deaths have increased six- fold over the past 18 years, and have contributed to a lowering of overall US life expectancy.
It’s Mueller Time: A Book Review
Small “d” democracy
By Mark Lurinsky
Sometime after Robert Mueller’s late May press conference cast doubt on his willingness to become a witness at public hearings, I decided that I would recommit to the challenge of reading the full Mueller Report, which I had bought and put aside. (Democracy isn’t a spectator sport, I told myself.) I’m glad now that I pressed on. With Mueller’s testimony to Congress now imminent, reading the report makes even more sense for us.
Reading The Mueller Report: Easier Than You Think
Small “d” democracy
By Mark Lurinsky
Editions
I bought the Washington Post edition of the report, which is now available for under $10. There are at least three versions in print.[1] I’m not sure that it matters which one you read. My own preference however is not to begin by reading any publisher’s introductions or additional materials, at least until you have gone through the report itself, since the whole point in something like this which is the subject of so much controversy is to get your own understanding without being influenced by anyone else’s spin.
The Trump administration and the war danger
Small “d” democracy
By Mark Lurinsky
On May 9, President Trump’s national security advisor John R. Bolton ordered a military contingency plan to send up to 120,000 U.S. troops to the Middle East, although Trump, a few days later, insisted he doesn’t want a war with Iran. How great is the war danger? Where is it coming from? What can be done to prevent war?
BlueWaveNJ Is Fighting For Women's Rights And We Need Your Help
This week BlueWaveNJ joined progressive organizations across the country in hosting a rally for the National Day of Action to #StopTheBans and protect women's rights. We rallied in Montclair with over 150 attendees, to stand up to the draconian and cruel anti-abortion bills being proposed in states across the country.
We had local leaders, activists, and elected officials speak to the importance of legal abortion.
Protect Women's Rights In New Jersey
A5287 Establishes "New Jersey Born-Alive Abortion Survivors Protection Act."
This bill is a thinly veiled attempt to criminalize the right for women to make choices about their own bodies. The below is a list of the representatives who have supported this bill and their opponents in this year’s upcoming elections.
Read the full text of this anti-choice and anti-women bill here.
Where does Trump stand on violent anti-Semitism?
Small “d” democracy
By Mark Lurinsky
In the wake of the horrendous shooting attack in the synagogue near San Diego, California, on the last day of Passover, we have to consider whether President Donald Trump is capable of leading our country in any meaningful way to combat an upsurge in anti-Semitic violence. Trump’s response to the shooting, in which an avowed white nationalist wielding an AR-type assault rifle killed one woman and injured the Poway synagogue’s rabbi and a young girl, was to do three things: He tweeted the usual “thoughts and prayers” to those affected. He assured the injured Rabbi Goldstein that “I have a son-in-law who’s Jewish, a daughter that’s Jewish ….” And he stated, “I love Israel.”
But what else do we need to know in order to see the bigger picture?
NJ Voting Security at Risk
Dear BWNJ Activists,
As you may be aware, our current voting machines have no "paper trail". The Sequoia AVC Advantage Machines are 1980 vintage computer technology and produce no record of each ballot.
The good news is that all the counties are about to buy new machines since our current machines are aging out. The bad news is that there is no transparency to this purchase.
Right now, it seems that most counties are favoring a machine that will print a 3" wide 'receipt' of the voters’ choices as marked by the voter on a touch screen. This receipt will be used for audits of each election, and any recounts. This is an improvement, to be sure, and as voting activists, we welcome the addition of a paper trail.
However, this is not the system recommended by security experts. The machines that print a voter 'receipt' can be hacked, and half of voters, in a trial at a real polling place, did not check the paper receipt, while the half that did, checked theirs’ for an average of 3.9 seconds on an 18-contest ballot. (See summary of the study here) In addition, this system is more expensive.
The system recommended by security experts is a hand-marked paper ballot counted by an optical scanner at the polling place. The hand-marked ballots are kept in a tamper proof box for later auditing and they are the ballot of record.
This is an area where local level political activism can make a difference.
Medicare for...How Many? The spectrum of Democratic healthcare bills
it’s the candidates who can connect their plans and messages to voters’ worries about out of pocket costs who will reach beyond the activists in their base. And the candidates aren’t speaking to that much, at least so far.
That claim is based mainly on Kaiser polling, which finds that 48 percent of voters worry about paying their health care bills, and half of people who are sick have trouble paying their medical bills.
The Jury’s Back Now: William Barr, Health Care, And The Rule Of Law
Small “d” democracy
By Mark Lurinsky
Earlier in the year I wrote a post on why we shouldn’t expect particularly good things from William Barr as attorney general -- while allowing that “the jury is still out.”
It looks like that jury is back now, and it’s not good.
No, I’m not talking about Barr’s role as the gatekeeper to the Mueller report. I’m referring to the attorney general’s complete public silence when in late March the Justice Department’s lawyers, following President Trump, sent a letter to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals stating that DOJ fully supports a recent district court ruling striking down the Affordable Care Act in all respects -- and intends to file a brief with that position in the pending appeal.